The Federal High Court sitting in Abuja, has fixed March 22, to determine if the former boss of Intelligence Response Team (IRT) of the Nigeria Police Force, Abba Kyari has a case to answer over alleged complicity in cocaine dealing.
Abba Kyari and four other suspended police officers are challenging the competence of criminal charges on which they are being tried.
The presiding judge, Justice Emeka Nwite chose the date for ruling after listening to submissions by lawyers to the prosecution and defence.
The National Drug Law Enforcement Agency, NDLEA, is prosecuting Kyari and four members of the Intelligence Response Team (IRT) of the Nigeria Police Force, ACP Sunday J. Ubua, ASP Bawa James, Inspector Simon Agirgba and Inspector John Nuhu.
Read Also: Court Stops FG From Deducting Police Trust Fund From Federation Account
They were charged with conspiracy to deal in 17.55kg of cocaine; dealing in cocaine without lawful authority; conspiracy to tamper with cocaine and unlawfully tampering with the 21.35kg of cocaine seized from Umeibe and Ezenwanne.
The former IRT boss was also charged alone with attempting to obstruct NDLEA officials in the conduct of their activities by offering them a bribe.
Arguing the application, lead defence lawyer, Nureni Jimoh, SAN, prayed the court to quash the charge and discharge clients on the grounds that the defendants, who are serving police officers, were yet to be subjected to the internal disciplinary action of the Nigeria Police Council (NPC) and the Police Service Commission (PSC), as required by law.
The senior advocate contended that the failure on the part of the complainant (NDLEA) to await the outcome of the disciplinary mechanisms of the NPF in relation to his clients has rendered the charge incompetent and denied the court jurisdiction to proceed with the trial.
Also Read: Court To Determine If IGP Can Recruit
He argued that the utilisation of the internal disciplinary mechanisms of the Nigeria Police Council (NPC) and Police Service Commission (PSC) provided by the Constitution was a condition precedent before the defendants could be subjected to any external prosecution.
Nureni further argued that though the disciplinary action taken by the NPC and PSC had commenced earnestly and the applicants had previously answered queries issued to them by the police authorities before this charge was filed against the applicants, the charge wrongly truncated the disciplinary procedure commenced by these authorities
Responding, prosecuting lawyer, Joseph Sunday, opposed the application and prayed to the court to dismiss it.
Click To Read: Ataga’s Murder: Police Tells Court Chidinma Made Statement Voluntarily
He contended that most of the cases cited by the senior lawyer did not relate with the Police Service Act, saying the instant charge against the defendant was a criminal matter.
He argued that the defendants have not, either by their application or affidavit evidence, established any condition precedent required before the filing of the charge.
“To that extent, their application failed and bereft of any factual evidence,” he said.
He urged the court to dismiss the application and proceed with the trial.
