The insinuation that Governor-elect for Enugu state, Mr. Peter Mbah, is an ex-convict has been debunked by his lawyer Mr. Emeka Ozoani(SAN), saying it was false and tissue of lies from pit of hell by same people whose mission was to disrupt smooth transition in the state.
He said there was never a time Mbah was convicted or being a party to any plea bargaining agreement as been alleged by the evil minded people.
The senior lawyer on Monday stated that all allegations being levelled against Mbah on being convicted of criminal charges especially in relation to the charges delineated: FHC/L/230C/2007; FHC/L/09C/2007. FRN V NNAMANI CHIMAROKE & 11ORS are far from the truth.
He said, “Grievances have been vented in public by sections of those who bitterly argue that Mr. Peter Mbah, the Governor-elect of Enugu State should not have been allowed to vie for the office. For them, he is a convict arising from alleged plea-bargaining in the case of FRN Vs NNAMANI & 11ORS. This is so far from the truth and is not even close to being true.
Also Read: Nigerian Navy Secure Conviction Against Sea Pirate’s
“The Governor-elect of Enugu State was never involved in either of the two distinct categories of plea-bargaining (charge bargaining or sentence bargaining). He was neither a director nor shareholder of the four legal entities involved in plea bargain,” he stated.
“I take the leaves from the archives of the Federal High Court, Lagos Judicial Division, specifically, the records of the Honourable Justice M.N. Yunusa dated 7th March, 2013 and 7th March, 2015, respectively. The proceedings of 7th day of March, 2013 in FHC/L/09C/2007.
“There was K.C. Uzozie for the complainant (FRN) Rickey Tarfa SAN, with K.G.B. Oguawgua, A. Shamsudeen, C.O. Chijoke and Uwu Onuwuka for the 1st, 5th and 7th-12th accused persons,
Onyechi Ikpeazu with Jones Idu, Charles Udo, Nwankwo Amaechi, N.C. Joy Ozegwu (Mrs.) for the 2nd and 4th accused persons and Micheal Iyore with Ifeanyi Ezeogba, Tonia Onabanjo Mrs, for the 3rd accused person.
You May Like To Read: Court Martial Set To Prosecute 13 Naval Personnel
“The court had held that “After hearing K.C. Uzozie Esquire for the complainant, informing the court that they have an application pursuant to Section 163 of the criminal procedure Act, to amend the charge and as per the Amended charge, the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Accused persons be discharged. O. Ikpeazu SAN for the 2nd and 4th Accused persons not opposing and Micheal Iyore Esquire for the 3rd accused person not opposing.
“The court had ordered that “the 2nd, 3rd and 4th accused persons are hereby discharged and that the case is hereby adjourned to the 28th day of May, 2013.
ISSUED AT LAGOS, under the seal of the court and the hand of the presiding judge this 7th day of March, 2013. Attachment A,” Ozoani said.
He added that Mbah was also not the owner of any of the companies that engaged in plea bargaining and has no relationship with any of the companies.
He added that “the leaves undoubtedly settles the casus belli between the feuding Thomases.”
